Playlist Push is the only playlisting service I'd use - I did a lot of research on how to avoid bots and they are super in depth with vetting their playlists - more so than any other platform I found. I don't trust submithub and don't use it because they don't really vet for bots so I wouldn't risk it. So I recently tried playlist push for a small campaign (ya girl is an indie artist ballin on a budget teheh) but it was great bang for the buck.

Overall, we would consider using this service again as we were satisfied with the end results and our campaign accomplished what we wanted to achieve. However, during the course of our campaign, it was absolute drudgery reading the curator responses that included unsolicited reviews. A handful of curator responses simply stated they were rejecting our submission because the track didn't match their playlist, which was perfectly acceptable. However, the majority of curators that rejected our submission presumably felt obligated to try and critique our track, offering the most idiotic and asinine comments imaginable. "The chorus keeps repeating", "The drums don't match the singing", "The tempo needs to change", and "I don't like your cover art", were just a few of the facepalms we received. I would propose to Playlist Push that if a submission is being rejected, they direct the curator to simply state the track is not for their playlist and to avoid attempts at being music theorists or having any knowledge of production. After paying $500, and while patiently waiting weeks for results to accrue, being bombarded with these absurd comments was marginally tolerable.

Gave our song a huge boost and helped get us on the algorithmic playlists as well! Much better than submithub and other services ive used. It is worth the money FOR SURE. Make sure you have an absolute HEATER of a song and promote that on here.