Overall, we would consider using this service again as we were satisfied with the end results and our campaign accomplished what we wanted to achieve. However, during the course of our campaign, it was absolute drudgery reading the curator responses that included unsolicited reviews. A handful of curator responses simply stated they were rejecting our submission because the track didn't match their playlist, which was perfectly acceptable. However, the majority of curators that rejected our submission presumably felt obligated to try and critique our track, offering the most idiotic and asinine comments imaginable. "The chorus keeps repeating", "The drums don't match the singing", "The tempo needs to change", and "I don't like your cover art", were just a few of the facepalms we received. I would propose to Playlist Push that if a submission is being rejected, they direct the curator to simply state the track is not for their playlist and to avoid attempts at being music theorists or having any knowledge of production. After paying $500, and while patiently waiting weeks for results to accrue, being bombarded with these absurd comments was marginally tolerable.

The first platform to offer me the curation experience, I am truly grateful. As someone who has been following the development of the platform from the very beginning, I can say that they are progressing very effectively and in a planned manner. They are also very reliable for artists and they give their full due to the price they pay. It is a pleasure to be a part of this ecosystem, even if it is small.

We use Playlist Push to help promote our priority single releases and always have a happy experience with the results of each campaign and overall level of service. I can thoroughly recommend them and it is not often one can say that in the playlist promo world! Andy McQueen, Chairman, the Notting Hill Music Group