I tried out Playlist Push after the service came highly recommended during a music marketing course. For our latest single, the service was quite effective in boosting Spotify numbers! If you have a strong song that fits a certain mood and the budget I would definitely give Playlist Push a go. If you ran campaigns over multiple singles you could gain some solid Spotify numbers. My only critique is the cost is on the expensive side - I'm in AUS so there is a conversion rate.

PP placed my song on several playlists that fit very well, and generated significant stream numbers. Ideally those streams would have generated followers too, though of course that's a different challenge.

Overall, we would consider using this service again as we were satisfied with the end results and our campaign accomplished what we wanted to achieve. However, during the course of our campaign, it was absolute drudgery reading the curator responses that included unsolicited reviews. A handful of curator responses simply stated they were rejecting our submission because the track didn't match their playlist, which was perfectly acceptable. However, the majority of curators that rejected our submission presumably felt obligated to try and critique our track, offering the most idiotic and asinine comments imaginable. "The chorus keeps repeating", "The drums don't match the singing", "The tempo needs to change", and "I don't like your cover art", were just a few of the facepalms we received. I would propose to Playlist Push that if a submission is being rejected, they direct the curator to simply state the track is not for their playlist and to avoid attempts at being music theorists or having any knowledge of production. After paying $500, and while patiently waiting weeks for results to accrue, being bombarded with these absurd comments was marginally tolerable.