Overall, we would consider using this service again as we were satisfied with the end results and our campaign accomplished what we wanted to achieve. However, during the course of our campaign, it was absolute drudgery reading the curator responses that included unsolicited reviews. A handful of curator responses simply stated they were rejecting our submission because the track didn't match their playlist, which was perfectly acceptable. However, the majority of curators that rejected our submission presumably felt obligated to try and critique our track, offering the most idiotic and asinine comments imaginable. "The chorus keeps repeating", "The drums don't match the singing", "The tempo needs to change", and "I don't like your cover art", were just a few of the facepalms we received. I would propose to Playlist Push that if a submission is being rejected, they direct the curator to simply state the track is not for their playlist and to avoid attempts at being music theorists or having any knowledge of production. After paying $500, and while patiently waiting weeks for results to accrue, being bombarded with these absurd comments was marginally tolerable.

I've had great success promoting my music through Playlist Push. The integrity of the playlists is high and I'm very happy with the results for my campaigns.

PlaylistPush effortlessly sends my music to curators, yielding amazing results. It's rewarding to see my work connect with the right audience and grow organically.