Nathaniel Barrett
Overall I thought it was useful and that most the curators gave thoughtful reviews,there were a few curators who didn't give constructive feedback and where dismissive, but overall it was a good learning experience.
Read moreCeaser Cavalli
Loved the honesty didn’t like the lack of playlist adds, while this can be attributed to their standards on what’s good or bad, music is not linear at all there is no right or wrong. These playlister’s literally say I like 80 percent of this track but because of 20 percent I will not be adding you, because I wanted this 20 percent in, as if I was making the music to satisfy a human being 100 percent in its entirety. That’s not how humans work , that’s not how music works , and that’s not how humans respond to anything especially music. Now I will rate no lower then 3 stars because like I said I loved the honesty music is not linear music is growing and ever changing so as long as the playlister’s were being genuine on judging the art and not the artist well then I can’t complain. ( as of today December 1st they have contacted me and are trying to resolve the issue)
Read moreJuan V. LF
Overall, it was a good enough experience to warrant an immediate follow up campaign. The vast majority of “playlisters” left clear and concise reasons why they liked the song or why they declined. A few made it sound like they were going to add it but declined… For transparency sake, I would suggest allowing us to see how long the curator listened to the song. The first campaign delivered better playlists, as far as genre match and streams. The second campaign for the same song was not as good, as far as, genre match and daily streams are concerned. With that being said, we understand that our genre is a bit niche, so we get that it’s hard to find placements and the amount of streams. Overall, we will be using your service again for our next release. If there’s a discount code, please shoot it our way.
Read more